SM: I write fantasy and science fiction.
AD: Science fiction with an ecoscience bent.
DL: I recently coauthored a science fiction book with Mercedes Lackey.
Q: How do you reconcile fantasy with real world science?
SM: In Dead Girl Walking, zombies are a part of the world. My protagonist wants to be an astronaut. How do you hide your essential nature (rigorous medical testing). Does she have the “rot” stuff?
JAG: Urban fantasy is contemporary-ish. Can, or should, magic be explained? Charles de Lint doesn’t explain his magic, it’s wondrous. What is the attitude toward magic in your novels? Is it threatening, or saving?
DL: Magic is an underlying, mysterious thing for me, but it follows the rules of science, the laws of thermodynamics. My mage does magic by completing complex equations in her head.
SM: Most people accept our technology as magical. Flick a switch and you have light. Push a button and you can communicate with people all over the world.
JAG: Magic and technology are not indistinguishable. In urban fantasy and superhero subgenres, 1% have “bought” immortality. The blue collar class has lucked into it somehow. It’s wish fulfillment. Neil de Grasse Tyson says that you don’t have to “believe” in science. It works for everybody. In fantasy, you often have to be “the right” person. The one. Anyone can learn science.
AD: Access to science is privileged too, though.
SM: Barbara Hambly’s editor wouldn’t buy one of her books because it was written in terms of fantasy. The science wasn’t explained.
AD: What about Thor? Marvel’s tried to explain that all of Asgardian magic is, in fact science, but it’s not explained either. What about Pern? Lord Valentine’s Castle?
SM: Dracula was born out of the fear of women’s power of creation and “blood magic.” People are as afraid of science or nature as they are of the supernatural.
JAG: They are placed side-by-side, too. The virus zombie vs. the raised, Vodoun zombie. There’s a story from the set of Star Trek: The Next Generation, where the writer’s would put in a placeholder: Jeordy – tech. This would be the cue for the researcher to come up with some kind of plausible explanation for what science had apparently just made happen.
SM: With NCIS, it’s the same thing. Their placeholder is: Abby – technobabble.
DL: The project I’ve been working on has been a Google Docs collaboration. Each author has a specialization and lends their expertise to the project. Pharmacology, molecular biology, etc.
JAG: Peter Watt asked the question, “At what point is your bafflegab authentic enough?”
DL: It has to be grounded in something real.
JAG: Orson Scott Card says that there are three questions the reader shouldn’t ask: Huh? So what? and Who cares?
SM: When did we stop trusting “once upon a time”?
AD: Are there better branches of science that fit better with fantasy?
SM: The so-called “soft” sciences: sociology, anthropology, political science.
JAG: In my latest novel, I have four young protagonists, a physicist, a chemist, a biologist, and a geologist. All of them are “supers.”
SM: Is the increasing prevalence of autism evolutionary? It’s one of the questions that intrigues me. I inherited the history library of a professor friend of mine. It’s an excellent resource for steampunk. The science in steampunk needs to be shown, not explained.
DL: One of my characters is a geomancer, so she has to have math and physics.
SM: Look at Dresden. Magic is the realm of the guy in the basement with a hockey stick wand. Magic has a cost. Science does not.
DL: Science has to have a cost.
AD: Why? I want to write magic that works and has no cost.
SM: Then we have the problem of Superman.
Q: Does is come down to the transfer of energy? The way I see it, once that’s broken, so is the science.
JAG: Iron Man breaks science all the time.
Q: Do you explain it?
SM: You have to sell it, make it believable.
DL: Serve the story.
JAG: Like the faster than light in Star Wars; you either buy it, or you don’t. You can’t keep technology a secret.
Q: What about explaining the force in terms of “midichlorians”?
JAG: Midichlorians doesn’t really explain anything.
SM: Is A Wrinkle in Time science fiction, or fantasy?
Q: Or the technomages from Babylon 5?
SM: And we’re back to the Superman problem. Read A Canticle for Leibowitz. There is science beside the new church and its radiation saints.
JAG: Ultimately, you have to serve your story the best way you can.